top of page
F-18C.jpg

A.W.35

UK

Scimitar

First flight

1933

In service

1933

info

Total in database

Crashed

0

info

Displays

info

Land Leased

Airplane.png
cockpit.png
engine_edited.png
Variant
First Flight
Max Speed
Max Range
Max Weght
Max Celling:
Wing Span
length
height
A.W.35 (Proposed alternative engine variant)
225
520
~7,500
24,000
37.5
26.5
11.5
A.W.35 (Norwegian service)
01/01/1936
202
495
~7,200
22,000
37.5
26.5
11.5
A.W.35 (Prototype)
01/01/1936
205
510
~7,000
23,000
37.5
26.5
11.5

Design and Development
During the mid-1930s, Armstrong Whitworth explored multiple options to improve the performance of the A.W.35 Scimitar, whose original Bristol Mercury VI radial engine left the aircraft underpowered relative to contemporaries like the Hawker Hurricane and Messerschmitt Bf 109. The company proposed an alternative powerplant variant to attract additional export customers and address complaints from Norway regarding limited speed, climb, and operational ceiling. This variant remained conceptual and never progressed beyond detailed engineering drawings.


Proposed Powerplant and Enhancements

The alternative variant was designed around either:

  • Bristol Pegasus IX radial engine (~890 hp), which promised a significant increase in speed and climb rate, or

  • Rolls-Royce Kestrel V-12 inline engine (~745–695 hp depending on configuration) to improve aerodynamic efficiency and reduce frontal drag.

Enhancements envisioned with the alternative engine included:

  • Strengthened airframe to cope with increased engine torque and weight

  • Revised cowling and cooling system to accommodate liquid-cooled or more powerful radial designs

  • Optimized propeller selection, including variable-pitch options, to improve takeoff and climb performance

  • Potential increase in bomb or fuel capacity due to improved engine output, aiming for longer range or heavier payload

The goal of these modifications was to make the Scimitar competitive with other contemporary monoplane fighters while retaining its sleek, low-wing monoplane design and retractable landing gear.


Armament

The proposed engine upgrade did not inherently alter the aircraft’s intended armament, which remained:

  • Four 7.9 mm machine guns in the wings

  • Provision for light bomb load under the wings if exported for strike roles

Some conceptual sketches considered fitting heavier forward-firing weapons, but these were speculative and never tested.


Operational Context

Although the engine upgrade promised improved performance, no prototype was ever converted or built. By the time these proposals were circulating in 1936–1937, the pace of fighter development had already overtaken the Scimitar. The Hawker Hurricane and Supermarine Spitfire were entering production with superior speeds, climb rates, and armament. Consequently, the alternative-engine A.W.35 variant remained a paper project, with no operational impact or export sales.


Legacy

The proposed alternative engine variant illustrates Armstrong Whitworth’s recognition of the Scimitar’s shortcomings and the challenges faced by smaller manufacturers competing against rapidly evolving fighter designs. While the variant could have offered improved speed and maneuverability, it came too late to influence either the Norwegian order or potential British adoption. The project remains a footnote in aviation history, reflecting the transitional period between interwar biplane designs and fully modern monoplane fighters.

0eae9f2f-ab8d-4880-9613-37a7904eda33

41,427

MilitaryBrief.com © 2026
Research and content by Ray Via

bottom of page