




Flying Fortress

B-17



















Design country
USA
ROLE
Heavy bomber
First flight
1935
1,296
Crashed
Total in database
4
1
Land Leased
Displays
0
Squadrons








Production Analysis
Production Numbers
Model 299 | Prototype | 1 | |
Y1B-17 | Heavy bomber | 13 | |
Y1B-17A | Heavy bomber | 1 | |
B-17B | Heavy bomber | 39 | |
B-17C | Heavy bomber | 38 | |
B-17D | Heavy bomber | 42 | |
B-17E | Heavy bomber | 512 | |
B-17F | Heavy bomber | 3405 | |
B-17G | Heavy bomber | 8680 |
Key Statistics
Total Production:
Production Span:
Variants Count:
Performance Range:
8,524
1940 -1944
3
417 - 446 mph
The Boeing Model 299 was the prototype four-engined heavy bomber that laid the foundation for the iconic B-17 Flying Fortress. Designed in the early 1930s in response to a U.S. Army Air Corps (USAAC) requirement for a multi-engine bomber with unprecedented range, speed, and payload, the Model 299 embodied a bold leap forward in bomber design. First flown on July 28, 1935, the aircraft immediately captured attention with its sleek profile, advanced aerodynamics, and unmatched performance. Though the prototype’s career ended abruptly in a fatal crash, its promise was undeniable, and the design philosophy it introduced reshaped American bomber development for the coming war.
Development and Role
The Model 299 was Boeing’s ambitious private venture, developed at a time when the Army specification called for a twin-engine bomber. Boeing engineers, led by Edward Curtis Wells, reasoned that four engines would offer far greater safety, redundancy, and power. The resulting design was groundbreaking: an all-metal monoplane bomber with a long, narrow fuselage, a high wing, and powered retractable landing gear.
Armed with a then-unprecedented five defensive machine guns, the Model 299 was the first bomber explicitly designed to defend itself from fighter attack, foreshadowing the “Flying Fortress” name later attached by a Seattle journalist. Its bomb capacity and range far exceeded existing U.S. designs, making it clear that Boeing had created a new class of bomber—one suited to the vast distances and strategic bombing concepts that would dominate World War II.
Powerplant and Enhancements
The Model 299 was powered by four Pratt & Whitney R-1690 Hornet radial engines, each producing about 750 horsepower. This choice of four engines provided the redundancy and lifting capacity to carry heavier bomb loads than contemporary twin-engine bombers. The four-engine layout also gave the prototype exceptional long-range potential, fulfilling the Army’s desire for a bomber that could reach distant targets.
Enhancements introduced with the Model 299 included:
Fully cantilevered wings with advanced stressed-skin construction.
Retractable landing gear, reducing drag and improving speed.
Powered flaps and trim systems that gave pilots more precise control.
A bomb load capacity of up to 2,200 pounds internally, with provision for larger loads in future refinements.
These features placed the Model 299 well ahead of its time in bomber technology.
Configuration and Equipment
The Model 299 featured a slender fuselage with multiple crew positions: pilot, co-pilot, navigator/bombardier, radio operator, and gunners. Defensive armament included .30 caliber machine guns positioned in the nose, dorsal, ventral, and waist locations, a radical step toward the concept of a bomber that could “fight its way” to the target. The prototype carried a glazed nose for the bombardier, though its interior arrangements were simpler than later production B-17s.
Although limited in bomb capacity compared to what would later be achieved, the Model 299’s internal bomb bay and aerodynamic design laid the groundwork for a scalable heavy bomber platform.
Operational Use
The Model 299’s first flights stunned observers. In trials, it reached speeds over 230 mph and ranges exceeding 2,000 miles, figures that dwarfed contemporary designs like the Douglas DB-1 (which would evolve into the B-18 Bolo). The press dubbed it the “Flying Fortress” for its bristling armament and formidable presence.
However, tragedy struck during Army evaluation flights in October 1935, when the prototype crashed after takeoff from Wright Field due to a control lock being left engaged. The accident killed Boeing test pilot Leslie Tower and severely injured Major Ployer Hill, the Army’s chief test pilot. Despite the crash, the Model 299 had demonstrated such extraordinary promise that the Army continued development, ordering a small batch of service-test aircraft designated YB-17.
Crew Experience
Although only one prototype was completed, early evaluations by Boeing pilots and Army observers praised the Model 299’s stability, power, and handling. Crews remarked on the sense of security provided by its four-engine redundancy, a crucial feature at a time when engine reliability was far from guaranteed. The prototype also introduced crews to the concept of multi-gun defensive coordination, a tactical innovation that would define heavy bomber operations in the Second World War.
Conclusion
The Boeing Model 299 was not just a prototype—it was a revolution in bomber design. Though its career ended abruptly in a crash, the aircraft’s advanced features, performance, and concept of long-range, heavily armed bombardment created the framework for the B-17 Flying Fortress and, more broadly, for America’s strategic bombing doctrine. From its streamlined wings to its quartet of engines and defensive armament, the Model 299 represented a bold leap forward, and its influence extended far beyond its short service life, shaping the future of American airpower.
Pilots
Image Pilot | Top Ace | Squadron | Squadron | Variant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert A. Lewis | 393rd BG (USAAF) | 393rd BG (USAAF) | B-17 Flying Fortress | |
Robert K. Morgan | 91st BG (USAAF) | 91st BG (USAAF) | B-17 Flying Fortress | |
Capt John S. Walmsley Jr. | 8th AF, 488th BS | 8th AF, 488th BS | B-17 Flying Fortress | |
Gale W. “Buck” Cleven | 357th FG (USAAF) | 357th FG (USAAF) | ||
John C. “Bucky” Egan | 56th FG (USAAF) | 56th FG (USAAF) | P-47 Thunderbolt |
Serial Numbers
Serial Number | Variant | Named | Event | Date | Location | Factory | Manufacture Number | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36-149 | ||||||||
36-150 | 1974 | |||||||
36-151 | 1975 | Crashed | ||||||
36-152 | 1976 | Crashed | ||||||
36-153 | 1977 | |||||||
36-154 | 1978 | |||||||
36-155 | 1979 | |||||||
36-156 | 1980 | |||||||
36-157 | 1981 | |||||||
36-158 | 1982 | |||||||
36-159 | 1983 | |||||||
36-160 | 1984 | |||||||
36-161 | 1985 | |||||||
37-369 | 1987 | |||||||
38-211 | B-17B | Boeing | 2004 | |||||
38-211 | 27Jun39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2004 | |||||
38-212 | B-17B | Boeing | 2005 | |||||
38-212 | 9Aug39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2005 | |||||
38-213 | B-17B | Boeing | 2006 | |||||
38-213 | 24Aug39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2006 | |||||
38-214 | 31Aug39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2007 | |||||
38-214 | B-17B | Boeing | 2007 | Crashed | ||||
38-215 | B-17B | Old Seventy | Boeing | 2008 | ||||
38-215 | 11Sep39 | Riverside, CA | MSN 2008 | |||||
38-216 | 25Sep39 | Riverside, CA | MSN 2009 | |||||
38-216 | B-17B | Boeing | 2009 | |||||
38-217 | B-17B | Boeing | 2010 | |||||
38-217 | 29Sep39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2010 | |||||
38-218 | B-17B | Boeing | 2011 | |||||
38-218 | 9Oct39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2011MSN 2011 | |||||
38-219 | B-17B | Boeing | 2012 | |||||
38-219 | 17Oct39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2012 | |||||
38-220 | B-17B | Boeing | 2013 | |||||
38-220 | 20Oct39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2013 | |||||
38-221 | B-17B | Boeing | 2014 | |||||
38-221 | 27Oct39 | Riverside, CA | MSN 2014 | |||||
38-222 | 31Oct39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2015 | |||||
38-222 | B-17B | Boeing | 2015 | |||||
38-223 | B-17B | Boeing | 2016 | |||||
38-223 | 8Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2016 | |||||
38-258 | 15Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2017 | |||||
38-258 | B-17B | Boeing | 2017 | |||||
38-259 | B-17B | Boeing | 2018 | |||||
38-259 | 18Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2018 | |||||
38-260 | B-17B | Boeing | 2019 | |||||
38-260 | 22Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2019 | |||||
38-261 | B-17B | Boeing | 2020 | |||||
38-261 | 27Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2020 | |||||
38-262 | B-17B | Boeing | 2021 | |||||
38-262 | 30Nov39 | Seattle, WA | MSN 2021 |
Movies & Video Games
Books
Variant | First Flight | Max Speed | Max Range | Max Weght | Max Celling: | Wing Span | length | height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 299 | 01/01/1935 | 230 | 1200 | 38053 | 32000 | 103 ft 9 in | 68 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
Y1B-17 | 01/01/1936 | 232 | 1200 | 42000 | 31000 | 103 ft 9 in | 68 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
Y1B-17A | 01/01/1937 | 238 | 1200 | 44900 | 31000 | 103 ft 9 in | 68 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
B-17B | 01/01/1939 | 288 | 1050 | 45600 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 68 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
B-17C | 01/01/1940 | 287 | 1100 | 49650 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 70 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
B-17D | 01/01/1941 | 288 | 1100 | 50000 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 70 ft 4 in | 15 ft 0 in |
B-17E | 01/01/1941 | 303 | 1150 | 58000 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 74 ft 9 in | 19 ft. 2.4 in (5.9 m) |
B-17F | 01/01/1942 | 315 | 1500 | 65500 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 74 ft 9 in | 19 ft. 2.4 in (5.9 m) |
B-17G | 01/01/1943 | 315 | 1500 | 65500 | 35600 | 103 ft 9 in | 74 ft 9 in | 19 ft. 1 in (5.8 m) |
f1ed30f7-63c8-4290-8176-898729500045
42,819





